AI BATTLEGROUNDS · EDITORIAL ASSESSMENT

AI Power Rankings

RAW PEC's assessment of who holds power in each AI battleground, scored on Position, Scale and Momentum. First edition: three battlegrounds, as of October 24, 2026. Rankings are re-scored monthly.

AI POWER RANKING

Who Controls the Frontier Model?

RAW PEC assessment · as of October 24, 2026

Method

Leader

  1. Anthropic

    5.00

    Why: Preparing an IPO; Broadcom agreed to finance up to $42B of a TPU lease; Claude runs inside Google's Gemini agent.

  2. Google (Alphabet)

    4.60

    Why: Gemini 4 Argon generally available; launched the Gemini agent; OpenAI's GPT-6 models offered on Google Cloud; Gemini coming to Oracle applications.

  3. OpenAI

    4.60

    Why: Launched GPT-6.1 Sol at one-fifth of GPT-6 Astra's price; GPT-6 models on Google Cloud; IBM built an OpenAI practice.

Contender

  1. Meta

    3.40

    Why: Released Muse Wonder, its first frontier model, and the Muse Code agent.

  2. Microsoft

    3.00

    Why: Completed pre-training of MAI-Base-2, a 2.8-trillion-parameter in-house model.

  3. SpaceX (incl. xAI)

    3.00

    Why: Released Grok 4.6 and Grok 4.7.

Challenger

  1. DeepSeek

    2.80

    Why: Released V4-Pro and V4.1-Flash; raising about $12B from Tencent and CATL.

    Low confidence
  2. Mistral AI

    2.60

    Why: Raised a EUR 3B Series D at over EUR 21B; released Mistral Large 4.

  3. Moonshot AI

    2.60

    Why: Raised at about a $50B valuation ahead of a planned Hong Kong IPO; released Kimi K3.1 Pro.

Watch

  1. Safe Superintelligence

    1.80

    Why: NVIDIA alliance to raise compute about tenfold; no product released.

AI POWER RANKING

Who Controls AI Compute?

RAW PEC assessment · as of October 24, 2026

Method

Leader

  1. NVIDIA

    5.00

    Why: Agreed to acquire Hugging Face for about $11.9B; compute alliance with Safe Superintelligence; $1B commitment to Nscale.

  2. TSMC

    4.20

    Why: Approved about $29.4B for new capacity; Q3 revenue up 41%; manufactures Microsoft's Maia 300.

Contender

  1. AMD

    3.40

    Why: Agreed to acquire World Labs for about $8.2B and Taalas for inference.

  2. Broadcom

    3.40

    Why: AI chip revenue of $16.7B with Q4 guidance up 236%; agreed to finance up to $42B of Anthropic's TPU lease.

  3. Google (TPU)

    3.40

    Why: Committed EUR 13B to AI infrastructure in Finland; signed an 890 MW nuclear power deal.

Challenger

  1. Microsoft (Maia)

    2.60

    Why: Announced the Maia 300 inference chip for 2027; withdrew from a planned UK data center.

  2. CoreWeave

    2.60

    Why: Signed over $25B of new commitments; contracted power rose to 4.2 GW.

  3. Nebius

    2.60

    Why: Secured a $3.5B financing facility from Citi.

  4. Nscale

    2.60

    Why: Compute deal with Anthropic reported at $45B; $3.5B Figure deal; $3.36B pre-IPO financing.

    Low confidence
  5. Modal

    2.00

    Why: Raised a $750M Series D at $15.75B; run rate passed $1B.

    Low confidence

Watch

  1. Cerebras

    1.60

    Why: No material moves since its May IPO.

AI POWER RANKING

Who Owns the Full Cost of AI?

RAW PEC assessment · as of October 24, 2026

Method

Leader

No Leader: no company yet owns the cross-vendor view of AI cost.

Contender

  1. ServiceNow

    3.00

    Why: Launched AI Cost Management across model, SaaS and GPU costs; added value intelligence to its control tower; sells Flow standalone.

  2. Google Cloud

    3.00

    Why: Introductory Gemini 4 Argon pricing; per-project AI spend caps in the Gemini agent.

  3. Stripe (incl. OpenRouter)

    3.00

    Why: Agreed to acquire OpenRouter; launched Treasury for agents.

Challenger

  1. Salesforce

    2.80

    Why: Completed the Fin acquisition; new Agentforce editions priced 11-13% higher.

  2. Microsoft

    2.60

    Why: Cut internal Claude spending by about a third (reported by The Information).

    • The Information
  3. IBM (Apptio)

    2.40

    Why: Launched Apptio AI Value & ROI, linking AI and token spend to outcomes.

  4. Workday

    2.20

    Why: AI drove over 25% of new contract value, sold through Flex Credits.

Watch

  1. Snowflake

    1.80

    Why: No cost-of-AI moves in the last 90 days.

RAW PEC advises companies in the ServiceNow ecosystem; this placement received a second review. See method.

THE FRAMEWORK

How we score

Each company is assessed on Position (40%), Scale (20%) and Momentum (40%), each scored from 1 to 5. Weighted scores determine tier placement; thin or single-source evidence is marked Low confidence and cannot rank above Challenger.

Read the method